Which of these is NOT considered an exclusion for the Commercial Crime Coverage?

The reasoning behind identifying external hackers as not being an exclusion for Commercial Crime Coverage is tied to the nature of the risks associated with crime coverage itself. Commercial Crime Coverage typically provides protection against specific acts of dishonesty or theft involving employees and other individuals connected with the organization, such as partners or LLC members.

In this context, theft committed by members of the LLC, theft or dishonest acts by partners, and acts by employees known prior to the policy period clearly fall under the types of exclusions typically outlined in this coverage, as they relate directly to internal risks that a business might face from individuals with a vested interest or prior knowledge of the organization.

On the other hand, losses caused by external hackers represent a different category of risk, often addressed through cybersecurity or data breach insurance. These threats are considered external attacks and are generally not excluded from commercial crime coverage, as the intent and relationship to the organization differ significantly from those involving employees or partners. Thus, the correct answer underscores a recognition of the evolving nature of criminal threats faced by businesses today.